Eight Premier League clubs spent nothing in January. Why?

02-04 10:00
Reads 177

The January 2026 Premier League transfer window concluded with quiet activity, characterized by cautious spending from most clubs. The total outlay was £405 million, significantly more than any other league but representing a continuation of a long-standing, restrained pattern for the winter period.

Notable deals involving fees were scarce, with Jorgen Strand Larsen's £43 million move from Wolves to Crystal Palace and Sunderland's £17.5 million signing of Nilson Angulo among the few. Eight clubs, including Manchester United, Chelsea, and Newcastle United, made no fee-paying signings to strengthen their first teams. Arsenal's only business was an academy signing, while Liverpool's £55 million deal for a defender was agreed to commence in July.

This winter's spending was dwarfed by the summer window, constituting less than 13% of the season's record-breaking total expenditure of over £3.5 billion. This aligns with a historical trend where, since 2014-15, nearly 84% of the Premier League's cumulative transfer spending has occurred in summer windows.

The article highlights a widespread club mentality of reluctance towards January signings, viewing it as a time for necessity rather than opportunity. An anonymous agent quoted a club owner stating they would only do business in January "if he absolutely had to," reflecting the wariness most clubs feel about mid-season transfers, a sentiment consistently supported by the spending data.

#PLWinterTransfer#TransferWindow#PLTransfers#CrystalPalace

Eight Premier League clubs spent nothing in January. Why? - EPL News - News