Log in to watch
Live Match
Statistics
H2H
Lineups
PSIS Semarang
Persikad Depok
Attacks
114
77
Dangerous Attacks
65
32
Ball Possession
72
28
On Target
13
6
Off Target
90019
3025
Important Events
Live text broadcast
End 0-0
86′
R. Ananda
imus wiranda
76′
nur hari
F. Cadenazzi
76′
Fabiano Da Rosa Beltrame
a.nugroho
64′
h.saputra
yazid ibnu
62′
A.Lestaluhu
Habil akbar
62′
fikri ardiansyah
ramdani tawainella
62′
fikri firdaus
suryana
58′
F. Mahendra
F.Ridwan
58′
t.hidayat
M.Hamdi
54′
R. Saputra
Halftime 0-0
39′
9′
j.mena
Goal
Shot on target
Shot off target
Penalty
Penalty Missed
Penalty shootout
Own goal
Assist
Corner
yellow card
red card
Second yellow
Subsititution
Subsititution(injury)
VAR
Match Info

PSIS Semarang 0-0 Persikad Depok: Liga 2 Match Report

PSIS Semarang and Persikad Depok played out a 0-0 draw in Indonesian Liga 2 at Stadion Jatidiri on 1 November 2026, as a contest built on territorial control and disciplined defending ended without a goal. The hosts saw much more of the ball across the 90 minutes, but Persikad’s compact shape and willingness to defend their penalty area kept the match level.

The result gives both sides a point and a clean sheet, though it will feel like two dropped at home for PSIS. For Persikad Depok, an away point against one of the stronger hosts in the division is a useful outcome, particularly after they absorbed pressure for long spells and still carried a threat on the counter-attack.

Match overview: control without the breakthrough

PSIS Semarang started with the clearer attacking intent. The home side pushed their full-backs high, worked the ball into wide areas and tried to create overloads around the Persikad penalty box. Persikad Depok responded by dropping into a narrow mid-block, denying central passing lanes and forcing PSIS to circulate possession further from goal than they would have liked.

The first half settled into a familiar pattern: PSIS probing, Persikad resisting, and the occasional away break reminding the hosts that the game was not entirely under their control. PSIS’s best moments came from crosses and second balls around the edge of the area, but the final pass was repeatedly cleared or blocked before it could reach a teammate in a dangerous position.

After the interval, PSIS increased the tempo and pushed more players forward. The game became more stretched, and Persikad found more space to counter. Still, neither goalkeeper was forced into a sustained run of saves. The match remained a story of half-chances, defensive interventions and a final ball that never quite arrived.

Key moments

  • Early pressure from PSIS: The hosts created the first meaningful opening after working the ball wide and delivering a low cross, but Persikad’s defence cleared before a PSIS attacker could connect.
  • Persikad’s counter-attacking warning: Midway through the first half, Persikad broke quickly through the middle and forced a save from the PSIS goalkeeper at the near post.
  • Set-piece chance: PSIS won a free kick in a promising position before the break, but the delivery was headed clear under pressure.
  • Save of the match: Early in the second half, Persikad’s goalkeeper produced a diving stop to keep out a low effort from the edge of the box.
  • Late header: PSIS’s best chance of the closing stages came from a cross, but the header drifted wide of the far post.
  • Final scramble: In the final minutes, a goalmouth scramble ended with the ball hacked away, summing up a night of defending without reward for the hosts.

Tactical story: possession versus compactness

PSIS Semarang’s approach was built on patient possession and wide penetration. They tried to draw Persikad out before switching play, but the visitors refused to be stretched for long periods. Persikad’s midfield stayed close to the back four, limiting the space between the lines and making it difficult for PSIS to find a clean sight of goal.

Persikad Depok’s plan was clear: defend compactly, protect the central corridor and attack in transition. When they won the ball, they looked to move it forward quickly, often targeting the channels either side of the PSIS centre-backs. Those counter-attacks did not produce a goal, but they kept PSIS from committing everyone forward with complete freedom.

The match ultimately became a test of patience. PSIS had the territory; Persikad had the resistance. In Liga 2, where fine margins often decide promotion and relegation battles, that combination frequently produces a stalemate.

Standout performers

Persikad Depok’s goalkeeper was central to the result, making the game’s most important save and handling crosses confidently in the second half. The back line in front of him held its shape well, clearing several dangerous deliveries and limiting PSIS to efforts from distance.

For PSIS, the central defenders were steady in possession and dealt with Persikad’s counter-attacks, while the midfield worked hard to recycle the ball. The home side’s wide players offered the most consistent threat, but they were often met by two defenders when they reached the final third.

Liga 2 table and season impact

The draw adds one point to each club’s Liga 2 tally and leaves both with a clean sheet to build on. For PSIS Semarang, the main concern will be turning home possession into clear chances. The hosts had enough of the ball to win the match, but their final-third